4 ms·
About one person, probably not. I think this one hits close to home for a lot of us that have stock in many of these large companies from being employees. Grant
by catillac 5y ago
About one person, probably not. I think this one hits close to home for a lot of us that have stock in many of these large companies from being employees. Granted, this situation seems particularly egregious, trading off of insider financial information not even available to most employees, but still.
I believe the intent was to provide a chilling effect on regular people at FAMGAN-type companies who may have some access to insider information and were perhaps toying with the prospect of acting on it.
- sebmellen 5y agoI was sure the acronym was FAGMAN...