3 ms·
> .. but there's something about this blog post that is off-putting and misses the mark; in fact, I don't even see how Apple being a closed ecosystem is relevan
by dorian-graph 15y ago
> .. but there's something about this blog post that is off-putting and misses the mark; in fact, I don't even see how Apple being a closed ecosystem is relevant to this specific argument.
Re-read the second half of the whole blog post (Specifically at the paragraph that starts with "Second, ...'), he kind of explains how it's all connected.
- saurik 15y agoThat paragraph kind of thrashes around trying to find a point, and then certainly doesn't lead to the "In conclusion..." paragraph, which simply looks to be a non-sequitor. :( This is the blog post of a company (a fairly large one, actually, that has in thr last 7 years it is operating become the default marketplace for some entire carriers) that is trying to use a confusing twist of logic to avoid talking about the actual trademark dispute, and instead focus on one of Apple's weak PR points. They may as well be making an argument through "social justice" to "sustainability" in order to invoke the "Apple ships their products using ecologically unfriendly packaging" card: it would sound about the same. They should stick to the issue at hand, and try to win on the merit of their points.