3 ms·

Sorry about that. Vacationing in Miami Beach right now so I might not be 100% in my descriptive capacity. Anyways, yeah, that obviously could work, but I'm kind

Sorry about that. Vacationing in Miami Beach right now so I might not be 100% in my descriptive capacity. Anyways, yeah, that obviously could work, but I'm kind of trying to make this all just run in memory because I'm already persisting all the data separately.

jkhdigital 5y ago
You can use Ecto schemas and changesets without a database! It is an incredibly useful library, once you get over the somewhat steep learning curve.
- jolux 5y ago
  Huh, TIL. Will have to look into that. Do you have any blog posts handy that explain this?
  - dnautics 5y ago
    https://speakerdeck.com/gvaughn/ecto-without-a-db-many-meanings-of-map https://speakerdeck.com/gvaughn/ecto-without-a-db-many-meani...
    - jolux 5y ago
      Thanks!
    - arthurcolle 5y ago
      Thanks for your reply to my original comment. I hadn’t considered Ecto, but I guess it does make sense to think of the ChangeSet abstraction irrespective of whether or not you are persisting the data in question. Appreciate it. Do you have an email or something so we could chat further?