4 ms·
>This is a very HN comment, because it ignores that a lot of people are paid for being physically present somewhere (not for their output). Are you saying you
by perl4ever 5y ago
>This is a very HN comment, because it ignores that a lot of people are paid for being physically present somewhere (not for their output).
Are you saying you think most people on HN do piecework? Because I sort of took for granted they were salaried.
At any rate, different companies within an industry area can be quite different.
I have had jobs involving programming that were:
- salaried
- hourly, with overtime
- required time entry of billable/nonbillable projects worked on in 15 or 6 minute increments
- required using a time clock (but not intraday time entry)
- union
- non-union
Only the time clock one (salaried, non-union) was primarily focused on "butts in seats". They also had something in the orientation about sleeping at your desk not being allowed.
- sgerenser 5y agoA friend of mine was about to interview at a company when he found out from Glassdoor they required salaried engineers to swipe in and out (among other micromanagement). Cancelled the interview and the recruiter was really miffed and acted like punching a clock is normal for software devs.
- perl4ever 5y agoSome people did dislike it enough to leave online reviews about it. But everywhere I'd previously worked, I had to account for every minute of the day so clocking in at the beginning of the day and out at the end was a million times less micro-manager-y from my viewpoint.