> It had a bit more time to develop And it wasn't planned, but evolved. No plan, no developer. Hard to imagine. > the genetic material of a human is just a si

> It had a bit more time to develop And it wasn't planned, but evolved. No plan, no developer. Hard to imagine. > the genetic material of a human is just a single gigabyte Indeed apples and oranges [*]. As long as we don't know all functions of this molecular machinery (and there is a very good chance we will never know all those functions) all comparisons with programming languages are pure speculations. Some "subsystems" seem to be representable by "programming languages" (as long as one ignores many unknowns and special cases). But the complexity not only happens on molecular level. > comes from the massive parallelism of the code execution A very daring comparison. [*] EDIT: mind that the genetic material e.g. assumes all the laws of physics and chemistry (also those we do not yet know) which are not explicitly encoded.