> You're inventing hypotheticals to say why they're going to charge you more, without evidence. Ah yes. There's no evidence. Except the countless instances of

> You're inventing hypotheticals to say why they're going to charge you more, without evidence. Ah yes. There's no evidence. Except the countless instances of dark patterns everywhere on the web tricking into you paying money. Countless instances where you can't cancel a subscription, and have to go through multiple hoops to do it. Countless instances when there's a runaway billing in a SaaS that leaves people with huge bills. But sure. These are all just "hypotheticals", and not the reality how the absolute vast majority of subscription business works. > You know when it's driving and when it's not. There's no unforeseeable per-lambda charges about it. Ah yes. Because of course it will be as simple as "when it's on, it will be charged", and not "when an obscure setting is on, you will be charged, regardless of whether it will be self-driving or not".