3 ms·
Yes, GNU APL is quite slow. There was some primitive implemented in GNU APL (as part of the interpreter, in c). A pure-APL implementation running on dyalog ou
by moonchild 5y ago
Yes, GNU APL is quite slow. There was some primitive implemented in GNU APL (as part of the interpreter, in c). A pure-APL implementation running on dyalog outperformed it by a considerable margin.
If you're looking for a performance, opensource APL, try j. Though if performance is not a priority then, as the sibling says, dzaima/apl or april should be more than adequate.
- moonchild 5y agoNB. I believe the primitive implemented Knuth's dancing links algorithm. NB. NARS is also very decent, though it only runs on windows.