This reads really nicely. It’s a nice story. But for me it breaks at a crucial point: how exactly will a strike look like that is way more sophisticated than a

This reads really nicely. It’s a nice story. But for me it breaks at a crucial point: how exactly will a strike look like that is way more sophisticated than a nuke or an invasion? I think your comment is giving AI a life of its own. Whereas I believe that AI is just a continuation of what we have seen for the past 70 years: Computational power will increasingly aid existing attack vectors. The nuclear strike will be better planned. The invasion much more effective. Through better computer programs, that some happen to call AI these days.