3 ms·

Scientists closer to developing invisibility cloak

• mechanical_fish 18y ago
  What we have here is the textbook example of why we don't see many science articles getting voted up on news.yc. - Linkbait-flavored, exaggerated, inaccurate headline stolen from Harry Potter. - Results presented out of context. How significant an advance is this? What exactly can I do with it? Who else is working on it? - Lame, vague description of technology at a level that wouldn't satisfy a curious fourth grader. - Reference (but no link) to papers in subscription-only journals that nobody can afford. What a waste of five minutes.
  • hhm 18y ago
    I think we need high quality science posts, not any ones. I think we used to have some of those.
  • deleted 18y ago
    [deleted]
• bullseye 18y ago
  http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=272266 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=272266