Perform as intended implies design. Low fidelity doesn’t deliver the design. There is no reason Apple should make things that don’t work as designed. > sayin

Perform as intended implies design. Low fidelity doesn’t deliver the design. There is no reason Apple should make things that don’t work as designed. > saying (for example) that desktops won't be supported on any display smaller than a given Retina resolution. Yes, this is an absurd exaggeration, because in fact we’re talking about a few new features that are not central to the user experience. > That would be anti-consumer and totally unacceptable. It would, which is why they don’t do it, and why it’s not representative of anything. It’s unclear what point you are trying to make other than that they could make bad design decisions if they wanted to, but in fact don’t.