3 ms·
It's a very interesting question. Personally I take mammalian intelligence as the relevant standard we're actually aiming at. So I'd say mouse+. Houseflys, I
by mjburgess 5y ago
It's a very interesting question.
Personally I take mammalian intelligence as the relevant standard we're actually aiming at.
So I'd say mouse+.
Houseflys, I think, are closer to non-intelligent than intelligent.
- criddell 5y agoSurely the AGI researchers have a benchmark though, don't they? Somebody else mentioned the Turing Test which is something...
- mjburgess 5y agoI dont think there are any AGI researchers. At least, I dont think computer science has much to do with AGI. The turing test is also not an AGI test, it's a "good enough" standard for fooling people. Intelligence fundamentally requires a multitude of environmental capabilities. The turing test considers only a single i/o boundary.
- dTal 5y agoThat's a little chauvinist! Birds regularly run circles around mice... er, so to speak.
- mjburgess 5y agoMy view is: mammalian is sufficient, but not necessary. Crow-level intelligence is probable likewise sufficient. I think aiming at mammalian is a good long-term ambition. I think, either way, we are hundreds of years off.