I count five logical fallacies here: > Another peak self-absorbed Hacker News comment Unnecessarily inflamatory - perhaps an ad-hominem attack, or appeal to e

I count five logical fallacies here: > Another peak self-absorbed Hacker News comment Unnecessarily inflamatory - perhaps an ad-hominem attack, or appeal to emotion. > in which we learn that curiosity only means tinkering with devices Strawman argument - this is a blatant misrepresentation of GP's point. > This comment is ignoring that a device that does all that without you having to worry about how it works is a tool way more powerful than one in which you need to at least know how to build everything from scratch with an enormous learning curve False dichotomy (there's no reason you can't have an opinionated device that works flawlessly OOTB while also being extremely hackable) and another strawman (OP never advocated for you having to do everything yourself, only have the ability to tinker). > So please, enough with this narrative, it’s really outdated and based on such a limited world view. Another appeal to emotion. I encourage you to take a class on logical argument, because this ain't it.