4 ms·
It's a fine question. But now when I read these pieces on trends, I do wonder. It's almost too good as a piece by itself. Would a reporter really care enough ab
by robg 15y ago
It's a fine question. But now when I read these pieces on trends, I do wonder. It's almost too good as a piece by itself. Would a reporter really care enough about watches to do all the research? It seems more like something that was teed up for them.
Read pg's essay. Then read this piece again. What suggests that it's truly original reporting?
- jamesbritt 15y agoRead pg's essay. Then read this piece again. I had already read Paul's essay, and still nothing set off my Secret Ad alert. Maybe I'm not cynical enough. What suggests that it's truly original reporting? What suggests that an article in the fashion section of the NY Times is going to be truly original reporting? I read the article and it resonnated with me because I used to carry a watch (but never cared for wearing them). Now I have a phone to tell me the time but in practice it's sort of cumbersome. A dedicated time-telling device might actually be useful, and I was curious if other people on HN had been considering this. And in that context an article that's just an article in the NY Times seems pretty plausible; I bet a good number of people have considered that using phone to quickly check the time can be annoying. Sure, this might be a really stealth ad or PR piece, but there might also be geek oneupmanship at play, with people eager to show off how quickly they can spot a stealth ad even where none exists.