> I don’t think Jeff Dean’s email [0] was concerned with missing citations, but that the work did not address and reflect the work in those citations that were

> I don’t think Jeff Dean’s email [0] was concerned with missing citations, but that the work did not address and reflect the work in those citations that were contrary to what the paper reported. Wouldn't that make the paper a PR piece for other projects at Google? Including some that may never be deployed?