3 ms·
I see your point but I think you have to factor in: 1) The driver's time. If I can read on my way to work, that's a win. Price effectively reduced. 2) Time sa
by chiefalchemist 5y ago
I see your point but I think you have to factor in:
1) The driver's time. If I can read on my way to work, that's a win. Price effectively reduced.
2) Time saved not getting an oil change, new tires, other maintenance, etc. Price drops a bit more.
3) I don't have to buy a "family sized" car that's only fully utilized a small percentage of the time. That over-pay / under-realized has a cost associated with it. Instead, I simply hail what I need when I need it.
4) Along the same lines as #1, family QT increases when I use a family vehicle.
5) When I'm able to rightly size my vehicle, there are eco savings as well.
6) Or perhaps I'm too old to drive and owning a car doesn't make sense either. If someone else has to shuttle me around, their time is a cost.
Again. I agree. Companies profit from some products and markets more than others. That said, these vehicles and biz models are not the past and can - and will? - change the future.
- SamBam 5y agoI think you're missing what the post was about. 2, 3 and 5 seem to assume VW is talking about renting the car, but it's about subscribing to the self-driving feature. 1, 4 and 6 are the same for either buying or subscribing the service.
- chiefalchemist 5y agoOk. Fair enough. I'll swing again... If you're buying a VW...alreaady a heft sum, tacking on some added fee and saying that it's disadvantageous the disadvantaged feel like a stretch.