4 ms·
> You paid for that feature when you bought the car, then you pay again to use it. Short answer. No, not really; a manufacturer can't simply lump the price of
by lonelyasacloud 5y ago
> You paid for that feature when you bought the car, then you pay again to use it.
Short answer.
No, not really; a manufacturer can't simply lump the price of all the unused stuff onto the base price. It would hand the low end to their competitors.
Longer answer.
Assuming that the manufacturers are not operating as a cartel (which is a different discussion), a manufacturer simply adding the total cost of all non-activated equipment and services onto the base price would be competitive suicide in the low(er)-end market. So no sane manufacturer would ever do that - they don't need to.
Instead, as long as the manufacturer's cost reductions through simplified design, production, inventory etc., plus the upselling revenue are greater than the additional hardware and licensing costs. Then they can, at least in theory, include heated seats, air conditioning, self-driving and whatever extra crap they like for no, or very little, additional initial outlay to the base model purchaser.
Of course, purchasers (and the planet) will pay for it in degraded acceleration, braking and fuel economy if extra weight is involved. Perhaps I'm pessimistic, but given the number of pointless SUVs and Trucks on the roads, it's hard to imagine that'd be a concern to the average purchaser.
- ghaff 5y agoIn fact, you can see how this plays out in the computer market. While binning goes on with desktop and commodity server processors, by and large manufacturers can't play too many games with building in unused capacity. However, at the high-end, especially mainframes, you absolutely have features like capacity on demand and pricing by workload and there was even more of this sort of thing in the past.