3 ms·
Sure, Stockfish just uses millions of years of evolution to build its heuristics and can't be transferred to any other game. The point remains, calling RL a che
by hervature 5y ago
Sure, Stockfish just uses millions of years of evolution to build its heuristics and can't be transferred to any other game. The point remains, calling RL a cherry on the cake compared to unsupervised learning when they are completely orthogonal and not mutually exclusive techniques is simplistic and unnecessarily offensive.
- unishark 5y agoSo it's bad to be the cake? I assume he means it's the foundation one falls back on when the more specialized categories of methods are not applicable. You might not like my analogy either. I think of supervised and unsupervised learning as the majority of the genome of ML, while RL is that little Y chromosome sometimes tacked on to address a few high-profile tasks.