3 ms·
> As a US citizen I think a better way to think of it is that we insist on proceeding with caution As others have pointed out, this isn't going to stop the oil
by zdragnar 5y ago
> As a US citizen I think a better way to think of it is that we insist on proceeding with caution
As others have pointed out, this isn't going to stop the oil from being pumped, as it is still economical (though less so, and dirtier) to move by train.
The keystone pipeline project has been thoroughly studied. All we have done is make sure that the Canadian oil field externalities are now even higher.
It is not at all unfair to call it foolishness rather than caution.
- kajecounterhack 5y agoCaution in the case of Keystone XL is about potential spills, not the actual pumping of the oil. It's okay that oil is being pumped there, if the economic engine so demands. It's good that it's being transported by rail, because it's less likely to create an (additional) environmental catastrophe. You might say it's dirtier to move the oil by train, I'd say it's responsible and a price worth paying to protect sensitive ecologies from inevitable pipeline leaks. You say externalities are higher, I say your worst case summed externalities are lower.