3 ms·
From the page's footnotes: > Changing your DNS resolver to a public one like Google’s instead of your ISP’s is not sufficient as of 2021, for two ISPs I’ve tes
by MaxBarraclough 5y ago
From the page's footnotes:
> Changing your DNS resolver to a public one like Google’s instead of your ISP’s is not sufficient as of 2021, for two ISPs I’ve tested, and I suspect for all UK ISPs that implement blocking.
- sneak 5y agoI read the article in full. Changing your non-DoH resolver (such as using Google Public DNS) means requests and responses can still be edited by your ISP. This is what the article is talking about. I suggested DoH (encrypted DNS) because this is not subject to such tampering. DoH (DNS-over-HTTPS) is not the same as traditional unencrypted port 53 DNS. Really, anyone who gives a shit about privacy should be using DoH exclusively, otherwise you are basically uploading your web history in real-time to your ISP for mining and resale.
- o8r3oFTZPE 5y agoI have been testing a large number of DoH servers. I have noticed that some names are not available across all (supposedly unfiltered) DoH servers. For example, there are some DoH servers that had no A record for webshare.io, the domain mentioned in the OP.