Thanks, I understand, but I wanted to address a broader point about software, which the comment I replied to talked about. To repeat: Sometimes software, or thi

Thanks, I understand, but I wanted to address a broader point about software, which the comment I replied to talked about. To repeat: Sometimes software, or things that interact with software (which is minimally what this is), has issues that may seem small, but end up big because of complexity. This turned out not to be one of them. But it would be a consideration in an investigation, even though (or so I guess) it was likely straightforward to dismiss it quickly in this particular case. Nevertheless, the time to investigate potential repercussions of something so critical is not "wasted". I updated my comment above to clarify that this does not seem to be a big deal so far from the software side.