3 ms·
Possible misleading title. Apple wants 30% of earnings, not “creator” earnings.
by thoughtstheseus 5y ago
Possible misleading title. Apple wants 30% of earnings, not “creator” earnings.
- WWLink 5y agoPossibly misleading comment. Did you read the tweet thread? Apple is demanding 30% of all transactions sourced from an Apple device.
- CubsFan1060 5y agoFrom the app. As someone else noticed, not having an app doesn't seem to have slowed down OnlyFans
- Jcowell 5y agoI feel like Onlyfans being a porn platform is the reason behind its success. Porn and sex are very strong motivators if dare not I say innovators for Platforms and technologies. I’m still hanging on the belief that VR will be catapulted by Porn.
- vanous 5y ago> Possible misleading title. Apple wants 30% of earnings, not “creator” earnings. "In writing and over the phone, we explained to Apple that we could pay them 30% of our revenues (from our 10% take rate). It'll be harder to cover costs and build features as a startup, but at least it'd be coming from us. Apple insisted on taking 30% of creators' total earnings."
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- BoorishBears 5y agoThis is being pedantic to the point of being wrong. Because of the nature of the app, the earnings in-app, which Apple wants, are creator earnings. Your suggested title would be less specific to the point of being flat out wrong if Fanhouse makes earnings elsewhere... which they do.
- mdoms 5y agoPlease read the thread before commenting.
- Hamuko 5y agoNot really. Apple's cut would take 30% of the creator earnings. Of course, it would also take 30% of the app's earnings. So instead of the creator getting $90 and the app getting $10 when someone pays $100 through Fanhouse, Apple gets $30, the app gets $7 and the creator gets $63.