I think it's a bit much to characterize this as appeasing the CCP. The article is clear about using evidence for curtailing national security risks instead of b

I think it's a bit much to characterize this as appeasing the CCP. The article is clear about using evidence for curtailing national security risks instead of blanket bans. Recently he has extended bans on investing in Chinese surveillance companies: https://www.theverge.com/2021/6/3/22516719/ https://www.theverge.com/2021/6/3/22516719/ Policies on selling to Huawei have also been maintained: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-huawei-tech-idUSKBN2B3336 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-huawei-tech-idUSKBN2B... What actions by this admin lead you to think appeasement is the goal?