3 ms·
A warning to anyone reading this: it’s a gruesome story.
by travisjungroth 5y ago
A warning to anyone reading this: it’s a gruesome story.
- mc32 5y agoYeah it is. If what he claimed was even partially true, that some were collaborators, but obviously it was also people hoping for escape, it’s almost excusable (I guess deGaul did). But in such cold blood. It’s still repugnant, not to mention innocent people and children. It’s one thing if you’re shooting bullets or launching lances or whatever at each other. There is no underhandedness. It’s plain and simple war. This is dark -even- if you give him some benefit of doubt, which I don’t, but if one did, even then, he was a very gruesome man. I think he earned that guillotine.
- travisjungroth 5y agoMaybe I'm misreading what you're saying, but just because he killed innocents fleeing occupied Paris and collaborators that does not at all make it "almost excusable".
- mc32 5y agoI’m saying it was wartime and the gov officially forgave people who killed collaborators and so on. So that part is almost excusable though I still think it’s just cold blooded and not excusable. The rest of it is gruesome. Innocent civilians seeking refuge and victimizing them is just repugnant.