I don't doubt that electrical service in nearly all the UK has _much_ higher uptime than the service here in Connecticut. I could be wrong, but I suspect that

I don't doubt that electrical service in nearly all the UK has _much_ higher uptime than the service here in Connecticut. I could be wrong, but I suspect that the infrastructure in the two places is built essentially the same way. I think the crucial difference is that Connecticut has so many more trees. Downed trees break the lines all over the state whenever a windstorm or a snowstorm comes through. (Come to think of it, most of the UK doesn't get snowstorms, either). I'm just saying that never for a second would I consider trading any of those trees for additional uptime. Nor do I want to pay the utility providers whatever it would cost to bury all those lines in the ground where they'd be safer from storm damage. I'd rather have a week without power every couple of years. I'd be curious to know if the story is different in rural or semirural Scandinavia.