Yes. Do better than this: "If there's a credible threat to build plenty of housing, they'll move on." What's needed is a mainstream, national name-n'-shame str

Yes. Do better than this: "If there's a credible threat to build plenty of housing, they'll move on." What's needed is a mainstream, national name-n'-shame strategy that identifies specific officials and offices that are causing the block in housing. Make the target highly specific and concrete, and ensure the messaging is big tent -- don't make it anti-municipal government. Make it anti-zoning. It's a waste of political bandwidth that most Americans know the name of at least one random House Rep that represents their partisan opponent either because Fox News or MSNBC, but none of us has any idea about the bureaucrats who are making terrible anti-housing policy decisions every day and driving up the cost of owning shelter. Read this article and tell me how the amount of pro-YIMBY energy hasn't yet turned this into a major, populist outcry against specific people and specific government agencies: https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/place/article/The-quest-for-design-utopia-at-SF-s-Pier-70-11034437.php https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/place/article/The-quest-...