4 ms·
You're thinking about this wrong. SMS 2FA is not for you. They say it's for you (for your security or your protection or your ease of use or whatever) but tha
by rsync 5y ago
You're thinking about this wrong.
SMS 2FA is not for you.
They say it's for you (for your security or your protection or your ease of use or whatever) but that is a lie.
In cases where SMS 2FA is forced, to the exclusion of all other proofing mechanisms, it is generally because the provider has a brutally difficult spam/scam problem that is complicated to solve.
So, instead of solving their spam/scam problem, they just throw some sand in the gears (of their users) and very loosely attempt to piggyback on the physical phone / physical SIM / physical ID confluence that constitutes a "normal user".
This is, of course, a very leaky mapping and anyone determined can, of course, work right around this. But it does seem to lessen their (again, brutally difficult) spam/scam problem.
The most ironic deployment of this (desperate) technique is Twilio whose own numbers cannot be used for SMS 2FA auth[1] and yet they require a true, mobile (non-VOIP) number to use their own service.
[1] Twilio numbers are not mobile numbers. Most SMS 2FA is sent from "short codes" and short codes cannot SMS non-mobile ("voip") numbers.