this is a post on a substack that reprints an interview with the same person that runs the substack, who (just) coincidentally has recently published a book. hm

this is a post on a substack that reprints an interview with the same person that runs the substack, who (just) coincidentally has recently published a book. hmmm. this is content marketing. there's a reason that when you publish legitimate research you need to disclose conflicts of interest. i mean what's next? articles with interviews with the sackler family where they go on at length on how opiods aren't actually that addictive? it's funny how everyone has such a high standard for articles and comments when it comes to jokes and supposed flame wars but absolutely zero standard when it comes to shilling. edit: this post was flagged and either someone vouched for it or dang permitted it. just goes to show that this site isn't about rigorous discourse but advertising merchandise (whatever form that may take) that's on message.