3 ms·
Yeah you can still ask people who have access to look up the status of a bug for you[1]. It just feels so needlessly convoluted. Since they're already using Jir
by grishka 5y ago
Yeah you can still ask people who have access to look up the status of a bug for you[1]. It just feels so needlessly convoluted. Since they're already using Jira, it shouldn't be too hard to set it up with proper access controls so you could see your own tickets, at least. They must have some reason to not do this.
[1] https://habr.com/ru/company/vivaldi/blog/561834/#comment_23131338 https://habr.com/ru/company/vivaldi/blog/561834/#comment_231... (in Russian)
- rasz 5y agoAmount of years old bugs with zero activity while they keep working on new features. Opera/Vivaldi CEO is really adamant about hiding both staff and user counts. Vivaldi even removed itself from User Agent string.
- starik36 5y agoIf memory serves, they removed the user agent because one of the Google properties was serving it substandard HTML/JS even though they use the Chromium engine.
- fifilura 5y agoYes that is likely the case. All browsers wants to use a unique user agent. It is the only way to prove market share => $$$. But it is ridiculously difficult to modify it without breaking sites. Take a look at your own user agent. It is likely it identifies itself as gecko/mozilla/chrome/safari/IE/KHTML all in one.
- rasz 5y agoThink about it for a second. They removed the very most important metric for a product selling content leads and placement (search bar default bookmarks, placement on the start page) because _one_ website had a bug?
- starik36 5y agoThey removed it because they claimed Google was sending substandard markup on purpose.