3 ms·
The obvious? More control over a perceived liberal-biased company from a republican controlled state.
by voxl 5y ago
The obvious? More control over a perceived liberal-biased company from a republican controlled state.
- jrochkind1 5y agoThat is not at all obvious to me, that's why I asked, it wasn't a trick question, there wasn't an answer that was obvious to me! OK. I dunno if that makes much sense to me, I don't think it does. (I am not a conservative fwiw). But thanks for clarifying!
- muyuu 5y agoI'm not American but I find it worrisome that some of the largest companies in the US (and the world) are so "obviously" partisan and willing to exert their power in a partisan fashion, as people accept this reality uncritically - whether it's in favour of their allegiances or not. That's what a dangerously broken society looks like. The common folk should never be openly supportive of "robber baron"-style political activism and it's unprecedented AFAIK.
- jrochkind1 5y agoWell, what is "obvious" is under dispute too. It is not "obvious" to me that for instance Google is particularly partisan. Most big companies donate to both USA parties in large quantities, because they know they need to buy the politicians whoever is in power. I haven't looked it up, but I assume Google is similar in it's lobbying. The largest companies are almost always mostly looking out for their own profits, and use their not inconsiderable power mostly to that end. And that's not unprecedented. I don't know if it should be less worrisome that we accept that uncritically! (Btw, to say something is unprecedented and call it "robber baron style" is a bit confusing, since the term "robber baron" as applied to industrialists/capitalists is over 100 years old! Whatever the "robber baron style" is, it originated in the 19th century! so not unprecedented)
- muyuu 5y agowhat is unprecedented is that a faction of the populace openly support the barons because they think they're doing their bidding it's a very dangerous game