I feel like Arisotle already responded to all of this over 2000 years ago. Ethical questions are strictly contextual, there's no overriding definition of Good t

I feel like Arisotle already responded to all of this over 2000 years ago. Ethical questions are strictly contextual, there's no overriding definition of Good to apply, what Aristotle calls the Golden Measure isn't an objective mark on a ruler, its the ability to discern what is right in given situations with their particular variables. An archetypal notion of Good that transcends specific situations is a notion of Good that solves no situation at all. Ethics is inherently contingent and Aristole's Nichomachean Ethics is basically a parenting guide on how to raise someone who is capable of this ethical praxis. There's also no easy settlement between practical self-interest or gratification and ethics either, if you're pursuing the one, you can't be pursuing the other since that would pre-suppose what the Good is. Its interesting to note that Aristotle was considered the practico-scientific thinker of antiquity into the middle ages in both the Christian and Muslim worlds (he is referred to as The Master, and The Philosopher endlessly), with Plato only making a comeback near the end of the renaissance IIRC and his import prior largely being in theology (again, in both the Judaeo-Christian and Muslim worlds).