> If it were opt-in that would be fine If it were opt-in it would be pointless. Surely that's obvious? > Facilitating public exposure of counting other people

> If it were opt-in that would be fine If it were opt-in it would be pointless. Surely that's obvious? > Facilitating public exposure of counting other people's money doesn't help anyone except the rich to know if you can fight them in court or how much to bribe them. This is a fair point, but I think these are relatively small individual downsides, which are also much more visible (and potentially addressable). Bribery is probably a harder nut to crack, but the legal system favouring the rich (& lawyered up) is something that one can potentially work toward balancing/mitigating with legislative measures.