3 ms·
You're not saying anything new as far as I can tell. Your grandparent already said what you said. I only disputed the "this costs next to nothing" part, which y
by throwaway525142 5y ago
You're not saying anything new as far as I can tell. Your grandparent already said what you said. I only disputed the "this costs next to nothing" part, which you don't seem to comment on.
- jiofih 5y agoI was commenting exactly on that. You think having every commit build, at the cost of destroying history, is gaining something. I think representing history correctly is best, and agree that “squashing buys you next to nothing” other than visually pleasant output. Clearer? My favorite approach is rebase + non-ff merge. Best of both worlds.
- jhasse 5y agoNo. They think having every commit build is gaining something. You think the disadvantage (destroying history) is more important, but you can't say that it "buys you nothing".