4 ms·
> I wonder what made them take this path? Very simple. Video conferencing software has an anti-network effect: If just one person in a group cannot use a par
by axiosgunnar 5y ago
> I wonder what made them take this path?
Very simple.
Video conferencing software has an anti-network effect:
If just one person in a group cannot use a particular app, nobody in the group can.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- ehsankia 5y agoDoesn't the same apply to chat software / iMessage? Also, FaceTime isn't really conferencing software (though they added a bunch of conferencing feature just now). It's closer to Duo, which focuses on casual face to face meetings, not at desk, presenting slides kind of video meeting.
- garciasn 5y agoNo, because it just moves to SMS for the group, instead. Video conferencing has no ubiquitous fallback.
- ulfw 5y agoNeither does SMS for large parts of the world. Not everyone has unlimited SMS like US carriers do. And/or as soon as one participant is abroad you're talking international SMS prices. This isn't a clean fallback option.
- Naracion 5y agoHowever it's a _good enough_ fallback that has been working for many groups. Yes, it doesn't solve the issue for all possible groups. But Apple likely doesn't care yet, and probably shouldn't until there are other changes it can work on that would affect larger groups (like bringing FaceTime to the web).
- cguess 5y agoMost of the world uses WhatsApp though, so there's no fallback necessary if most people in the world never even open up iMessage.