4 ms·
Several points; the title is slightly misleading, i initially thought (in my ignorance) that OP was referring to a company employee, also this article is surpri
by FridayoLeary 5y ago
Several points; the title is slightly misleading, i initially thought (in my ignorance) that OP was referring to a company employee, also this article is surprisingly open in 'naming and shaming' his competitor.
- caspii 5y agoYikes, should I have shown more discretion in naming the competitor?
- FridayoLeary 5y agoYou know better then me. But i hope that since what you are saying is easily provable there shouldn't be any problem at all. Nice article, by the way.
- caspii 5y agoThanks. I think it is.
- ceejayoz 5y agoNo. People should name-and-shame more often in these sorts of scenarios.
- janmo 5y agoIt could be that they were acting in good faith and paid some SEO agency/Guy unknowing what was going on.
- ben509 5y agoTalk to a lawyer.