> The name bunglers were usually white colleagues, but in rare cases, they were people of color. Is this disproportionate to the relative share of employees of

> The name bunglers were usually white colleagues, but in rare cases, they were people of color. Is this disproportionate to the relative share of employees of each racial group? Google is 52% white and 42% Asian. [1] Presumably Asian people are less likely to mix up other Asians, and the vast majority of the non-Asian employee base is white. So it makes sense that most of the "name bunglers" are white. They make up 90% of the non-Asian employees in companies like Google. 1: https://www.statista.com/statistics/311810/google-employee-ethnicity-us/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/311810/google-employee-e...