I can't help but feel calling this GPDPR is a sly attempt to associate it with GDPR. That said, the linked article doesn't give any good reason why our heath d

I can't help but feel calling this GPDPR is a sly attempt to associate it with GDPR. That said, the linked article doesn't give any good reason why our heath data shouldn't be used for research and planning. It's clearly in the public interest. Of course I have little faith that the UK government won't leave it lying on a train somewhere, whence it will be deanonymised and shared with all the wrong people, alternatively they'll eventually share it with insurers despite their words to the contrary etc. But the Register doesn't try to argue that point, so what is their ground for objection exactly?