5 ms·
Yes, but supporting remote by offering $0 - 0 salary and 0.00% - 0.00% equity seems legit and completely transparent: https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/repl
by bravura 5y ago
Yes, but supporting remote by offering $0 - 0 salary and 0.00% - 0.00% equity seems legit and completely transparent: https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/repl-it/jobs/aihA75TQr-platform-engineer-infrastructure https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/repl-it/jobs/aihA75TQr...
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- ilikehurdles 5y agoThis seems like an illegal job listing in Colorado.
- drusepth 5y agoI've seen a lot of companies "get around" this new law by just saying the job is not available to people living in Colorado, either explicitly on the listing or when you apply.
- samatman 5y agoA cursory glance[0] suggests this only applies if a company has at least one employee in Colorado. [0]: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/colorado-pay-transparency-more-guidance-job-promotional-posting-requirements-issued https://www.natlawreview.com/article/colorado-pay-transparen... To follow a tangent for a second, this doesn't seem wise on Colorado's part. It doesn't strike me as great law to begin with, but I'm willing to concede that point: the problem is that it creates a considerable regulatory burden for an all-remote company which takes on a single Colorado employee. As someone who works remotely since well before the pandemic, I'd be pretty upset about this if I were a Colorado resident. I have family in Colorado as well, and while I've never seriously considered moving there this law makes it even less likely.
- jollybean 5y agoI suggest that it's not actually $0 but rather they didn't want to disclose the ranges in the form.
- mypalmike 5y agoSeeing that I would simply assume they didn't want to advertise specifics about salary, which is not unusual, so they entered 0 into a form. Am I missing something?
- caslon 5y agoIllegal if seen by people in certain parts of the USA.