4 ms·
I do agree that tertiary sources are what they are (upsides and downsides) I was mostly responding to "but that still far from having any use of Wikipedia as a
by Kim_Bruning 5y ago
I do agree that tertiary sources are what they are (upsides and downsides)
I was mostly responding to "but that still far from having any use of Wikipedia as a product" ; which I think might be overstating your case just a little.