3 ms·

but the article is right in saying that AI advocates said no need for any new radiologists. I know this in the field of vehicle damages, AI is good but not goo

but the article is right in saying that AI advocates said no need for any new radiologists. I know this in the field of vehicle damages, AI is good but not good enough to take over... and that has been the case for a long while yet every now and then a new company / product comes saying that the future is AI and no need for human effort.

Inhibit 5y ago
True. I was internalizing "no new need" as hyperbole because it didn't make sense (given the reality of medical) but that's my mistake. On re-reading, a highly specialized and entrenched workforce having a 30% uptake on a new technology in only a few years seems phenomenal.