2 ms·
Might be okay on a humour site, or perhaps in an internal tool, but some of these are a bit tasteless IMO. It could be far more useful if you were able to pick
by kypro 5y ago
Might be okay on a humour site, or perhaps in an internal tool, but some of these are a bit tasteless IMO. It could be far more useful if you were able to pick from a selection of individual images or image sets depending on the usecase. Although even then these kinds of http error images scream early-2000s web humour to me.
- Sebb767 5y ago> Although even then these kinds of http error images scream early-2000s web humour to me. I think that's the point and it's a nice throwback :) But otherwise I agree, https://http.cat/ https://http.cat/ is far more harmless. Some of those dog pictures would probably not fare well when a less humorous colleague sees them.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]