Thank you for explicitly pointing it out. I disagree with you - I think you are using a different definition and there seems indeed to be discussion about what

Thank you for explicitly pointing it out. I disagree with you - I think you are using a different definition and there seems indeed to be discussion about what the definition really is. Wikipedia for examples uses the definition that I use, but in the Talk-section someone made a similar complaint to yours (or was that you :)). [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referential_transparency https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referential_transparency] I stick to my definition though, because... I find it more useful and I think it is the more common one.