> ...like your GP comment is suggesting Really? What I literally wrote is "neural networks have extremely limited applicability". > I'm not suggesting neural

> ...like your GP comment is suggesting Really? What I literally wrote is "neural networks have extremely limited applicability". > I'm not suggesting neural networks are a panacea. That's good. Because ML practitioners are, even if they phrase it differently. (The idea is that since neural networks can fit curves then any problem can be solved by a neural network given enough layers and feature engineering grease.)