5 ms·
501 and 206 are really disturbing.
by acanguven 5y ago
501 and 206 are really disturbing.
- blowski 5y agoDisturbing?
- fridif 5y agothe dogs have no legs similarly 422
- Sebb767 5y ago226 and 304 are, while funny, also a bit over the top IMO. It would be nice to have a "SFW" version of this page.
- blowski 5y agoI'm genuinely surprised at how many people are in some way put off by the images. I wonder if there's a cultural thing about people who dislike dogs generally. These kind of comment streams are always a good reminder about how you can never anticipate other people's responses.
- Sebb767 5y agoWell, it really depends on the context. Take this one: https://httpstatusdogs.com/304-not-modified https://httpstatusdogs.com/304-not-modified I'd surely crack that joke with close friends, but at work I would absolutely not risk that, especially if I don't know whether the receiving party has a similar humor. Compare that with http.cat: https://http.cat/304 https://http.cat/304 It's a cute picture of cats. It might get an eyeroll, yes, but nobody is going to accuse me of an inappropriate joke for that. 226 is even worse and I know quite a few female colleagues which would probably not take it well, irrespective of it being a picture of a dog.
- globular-toast 5y agoSo? What's disturbing about an amputee?
- bdcravens 5y ago501 is "not implemented". Makes a joke out of the missing limbs.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]