the second one makes sense and is useful, non-obvious advice the first one doesn’t add anything to the discussion. I would go as far as to say that it detracts

the second one makes sense and is useful, non-obvious advice the first one doesn’t add anything to the discussion. I would go as far as to say that it detracts from the discussion I can’t imagine any of SIFT allow genuine impersonation in their ToCs and there isn’t really a middle ground punishment. If the account has been found to be fake, then they can’t just give it a warning and move on. The account was in flagrante from the beginning and will remain in flagrante in the future, and will have to be removed. I know for a fact that this is facebook’s policy The “simply” implies that they wouldn’t have thought of this, and that it’s a be-all and end-all solution, when it’s very clearly the obvious solution and done alone would leave users unaware they’ve been duped