3 ms·
There are three major reasons why those get deleted. 1: Intent matters and advocacy is not permitted on Wikipedia. A lot of people don't like this rule or thin
by belorn 5y ago
There are three major reasons why those get deleted.
1: Intent matters and advocacy is not permitted on Wikipedia. A lot of people don't like this rule or think it can be ignored if they don't demand payment for it.
2: You can't editing Wikipedia to bring awareness of something while at the same time fulfill the notability requirements. The top 50 academics are important for their fields, and can also be completely unknown for the rest of the world. As an example, people in sport, music and cinema are much more common to have an Wikipedia article about them then academics. This does not mean academics are less important to society, but it does reflect notability.
3: As others has marked, writing a article about yourself or by a representative is heavily discouraged. This runs in the same vein as advocacy.
- enchiridion 5y agoIt's interesting to think that the event of these scientists doing these edits is probably morale enough for its own entry.
- belorn 5y agoYes, and events like that can have enduring notability given enough third-party coverage. In this specific case I tried to search for the article/event, but neither of the search engine gave me any results, to the point where I now would like a source from gscott about that story.