3 ms·
You are sadly continuing the perjorative drift with no beef. It's almost a cliche to say a few rude words about it, isn't it? I wouldn't argue with that view if
by vixen99 15y ago
You are sadly continuing the perjorative drift with no beef. It's almost a cliche to say a few rude words about it, isn't it? I wouldn't argue with that view if it concerned the Sun or the News of the World (R.I.P - no, I'm joking) though again, a critique minus the purple prose would be welcome.
Over the Anglosphere seventy million people read the Daily Mail. It's a highly successful enterprise. I agree that that does not mean it cannot be 'ridiculous' or 'dubious' but it does suggest that a smidgeon of supporting evidence for your view should be forthcoming. I read it most days and find it amusing and interesting in its reporting on topics not covered in the British broadsheets. Personally I enjoy a spot of reasonably-sourced gossip. I also enjoy looking at pictures of nice girls on beaches. Probably I'm a lost soul.
And so, how would you improve it? Please don't construe my comment as suggesting that that should not take place.
- JonnieCache 15y agoWell they could stop with the ludicrous health "advice" for a start. See: http://kill-or-cure.heroku.com/ http://kill-or-cure.heroku.com/ Then there's the whole MMR thing, and the rest: http://www.badscience.net/category/media/papers-mail/ http://www.badscience.net/category/media/papers-mail/