That is a ridiculous comparison. A business going under is very ethically different from people starving and being homeless. As a result, the people who own a

That is a ridiculous comparison. A business going under is very ethically different from people starving and being homeless. As a result, the people who own and operate businesses have a choice to decline business in a manner that people in poverty don't. That lack of choice prevents markets from functioning property. You seem to be advocatibg removing that choice.