4 ms·
It’s free to use, but it’s not open source.
by jackbeck 5y ago
It’s free to use, but it’s not open source.
- jawngee 5y agoHow are you using FFMPEG but it's not open source?
- hug 5y agoffmpeg is available under lgpl, so his project doesn't need to be open source, although the wasm version of ffmpeg itself should be.
- beagle3 5y agoNo, but it does need to be distributed in such a way that users can replace the ffmpeg provided with the product, with their own version of ffmpeg (and of course, provide a source from which the distributed ffmpeg can be built, unless it’s already configure/make/make-install upstream. Some say even if already upstream) But also, depending on codecs, it might be GPL; e.g. x264 itself is GPLd as are some other codecs. There are BSD licensed codecs. As ffmpeg relies on many other projects to provide codecs, it’s on a codec by codec basis - though the original configure makes it easy to disable all GPL upstrrams.
- jackbeck 5y agoThe wasm port of ffmpeg that I'm using isn't modified so there's nothing for me to open source. Once I finalize my modifications of the library, I'll be open sourcing it.