2 ms·
IMHO, just another blatant article claiming revolutionary discovery without details, papers, peer reviews aka clickbait. Moreover, this is an article you expect
by gabrielblack 5y ago
IMHO, just another blatant article claiming revolutionary discovery without details, papers, peer reviews aka clickbait. Moreover, this is an article you expect to find in generalist press, not in a supposed scientific journal. It's an article without signature also contradictory in some points, it starts with: "Despite exceeding the vacuum speed of light, the experiment is not at odds with Einstein's theory of relativity and is explainable by existing physical theory" and it ends with " however, because it is still correct to say that information cannot be transmitted faster than the vacuum speed of light". Is this the kind of journalism we like ?
- madengr 5y agoThey should send 0.2 ns long random bits through it, see if they get the data faster than light out the other end. Me thinks that won’t work.