3 ms·

It says a lot about the quality of our media/reporting when everything becomes politicized. I feel as though we have lost something important. Can we go back

It says a lot about the quality of our media/reporting when everything becomes politicized. I feel as though we have lost something important. Can we go back to the past method when things were looked at objectively?

rvz 5y ago
> Can we go back to the past method when things were looked at objectively? I sure hope so. However this time we can see from the past what side of the media is willing to capitalise on the lies and mask the truth for so long until a certain entity that goes against the mainstream establishment is literally deleted off from society. They were serious when they said they will do anything to prevent anyone that they dislike from being in that position of power. Anything also includes spreading disinformation, hypocritical actions, censorship, de-platforming and fake news.
panny 5y ago
>It says a lot about the quality of our media/reporting when everything becomes politicized. This is easy to explain, https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained#:~:text=Under%20an%20EUA%2C%20FDA%20may,are%20no%20adequate%2C%20approved%2C%20and https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emerge... If HCQ and Ivermectin were found to be the safe and effective treatments that they are, then no EUA could be made to fast track the experimental mRNA gene therapy "vaccines" from Pfiezer, Moderna, etc. The question I keep wondering is, "Why?" For what reason did they want to fast track these experimental treatments so badly?
doggodaddo78 5y ago
I like the sound of that. Heck, everything should be like that. Throw away political parties and celebrity popularity contests as leadership selection too. Pick a professional from any of various fields at random to serve as a public administrator in each office for a year as a civic duty. No more ambitious careerist popularity-seekers, no celebrities taking office for their self-interests, no more rich people buying politicians, no more PACs, and no more pointless elections to choose between crappy corporate candidates.

rvz 5y ago

> Can we go back to the past method when things were looked at objectively? I sure hope so. However this time we can see from the past what side of the media is willing to capitalise on the lies and mask the truth for so long until a certain entity that goes against the mainstream establishment is literally deleted off from society. They were serious when they said they will do anything to prevent anyone that they dislike from being in that position of power. Anything also includes spreading disinformation, hypocritical actions, censorship, de-platforming and fake news.

panny 5y ago

>It says a lot about the quality of our media/reporting when everything becomes politicized. This is easy to explain, https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained#:~:text=Under%20an%20EUA%2C%20FDA%20may,are%20no%20adequate%2C%20approved%2C%20and https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emerge... If HCQ and Ivermectin were found to be the safe and effective treatments that they are, then no EUA could be made to fast track the experimental mRNA gene therapy "vaccines" from Pfiezer, Moderna, etc. The question I keep wondering is, "Why?" For what reason did they want to fast track these experimental treatments so badly?

doggodaddo78 5y ago

I like the sound of that. Heck, everything should be like that. Throw away political parties and celebrity popularity contests as leadership selection too. Pick a professional from any of various fields at random to serve as a public administrator in each office for a year as a civic duty. No more ambitious careerist popularity-seekers, no celebrities taking office for their self-interests, no more rich people buying politicians, no more PACs, and no more pointless elections to choose between crappy corporate candidates.